The 30% gullible Americans
By:
Abeba Isahac This
summer I lost my only living brother to an unexpected sudden death, caused, I
strongly believe, by a broken heart after a long time of silent endurance and
resistance to extreme anxiety and sadness
which ultimately must have turned into a deep depression, causing the
gradual failure of all his major body organs, which I understand can be the
result of extreme mental stress. In
the end his body just gave in, as his spirit was no more willing to go on. At my
brother’s wake and funeral, I saw the very same people who had caused his
agony and pain, express hypocritical
sorrow and shed crocodile tears, which naturally caused my blood
to boil. But, as tempted as I was to embarrass and insult them by driving
them away and asking them to leave, out of respect for the occasion, and for
those genuine family members and friends who had come to pay their last
respects to him, I had to restrain myself, and only revert to, in silence,
curse them, and wish and pray that
what they had done to my brother may come to haunt them for as long as they
lived and beyond. To
come to my main point, it is with regards to the President of According
to statistics, it is a 30% of the over 18 years of age group of the American
population who still approve of what
now is being called Bush’s war. I am sure it baffles and boggles the minds of
all peoples around the world, even if one percent, let alone 30% of the
American people would approve and go along with an unprovoked war on a
country that never ever was a threat or a danger to them. True that making
wars is a part of the American psyche since the country was founded on
lawlessness, greed, belligerence, violence, intrigue, and uncalled for force,
and that, despite it all, it grew and prospered under such, to the extent
that it made them believe that even God was on their evil side, and that,
therefore, it must have been written in their destiny to do so. That belief was
the birth of the Manifest Destiny phenomenon. But
that is supposed to have taken place in an era where the untamed white man
had ran amok, abiding only by the law of the jungle in contrast to the
present time, and already in the 21st century, where the world
watches every single step taken by another nation, and where also, under the
umbrella of the United Nations, law and order is supposed to have reigned,
thereby civilizing human nature. At least that is what was supposed to have happened after Hitler’s
madness in the Second World War. Hearing
the unprofessional, careless and illegal threatening rhetoric being uttered
by the affirmative action recipient, assistant secretary of state, Jendayi
Frazier, makes me wonder how many Americans would believe her, or agree with
her, to the extent that, God forbid, it would end in the United States
invading Eritrea, with the explanation to the American people that Eritrea
posed to be a threat to their country and system of government? How many percentage of the almost 300
million Americans would really believe and fear that a nascent and weak
nation of four million population could pose a danger to them and their
livelihood, even if the false allegation coming from Ms. Frazier were, let’s
assume, found to be true? Even
then, unless I do
not think there is any one American, of any age today, who can remember a
time, in his or her lifetime, when his country America was not involved in
either a covert, overt, or in the process of plotting for a war, somewhere
around the world, no matter how far or near and no matter how small, weak or
poor the nation. As a matter of
fact, the weaker and the poorer the
nation, the better and easier for Compared
to the sufferings caused as a result of If it were not for American interest, peace
would now be reigning in the horn of
Africa, and who knows where So
what do the vulnerable 30% of Americans think about all this hypocrisy? To love one’s country and support one’s
troops is admirable, but to support a false mission just because the
government said so, and as a result to cause the needless sufferings of so
many, is called madness. If it were not so, then, in that case, we can also
absolve Hitler’s followers, saying that they did it out of love for country
and in support of their army. What is good for the goose is good for the
gander too. Is it not? So here
we are, reduced to the point where, affirmative action recipient characters,
the likes of Jendayi Frazier, take it upon themselves to threaten and demand
that a regime change take place in Eritrea, without even considering the
desire of the Eritrean people. But we
know that those ladies’ mandate is to create as many enemies for their
country as is possible, so that the gun factories in the At
one point it looked like, Dr. Bereket, with all the impressive prefixes and suffixes preceding and
following his name, and with all his alleged high education and experiences, would know better than to
plead with Jendayi Frazier. But on
second thought, these two probably deserve one another. Who knows if perhaps
he too is a victim of affirmative action in Ultimately,
|
The
content below this line is advertisement generated automatically and ertra.com
doesn't control or endorse the content in anyway.