|
November
10, 2007 PRESS RELEASE Bolton Reveals Frazer Worked to
Reopen Eritrea/Ethiopia Boundary Decision in Favor of Ethiopia Former
senior Bush Administration official John Bolton has publicly and
unambiguously revealed that U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs Jendayi Frazer sought to prevent demarcation of the
Eritrean/Ethiopian border according to the final and binding 2002 Eritrea
Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) decision. In his
recently published memoir – “Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at
the United Nations and Abroad” (Threshold Editions) – former U.S. Ambassador
to the U.N. Bolton states that in February 2006, Frazer informed him that
she wanted him to “reopen” the 2002 EEBC decision, “which she had concluded
was wrong, and award a major piece of disputed territory to Ethiopia” (Page
347). Bolton describes his surprise at Frazer’s position, because in
January 2006, he had gotten the Security Council to agree to a Frazer-led “U.S.
initiative” on the border issue on the basis that this initiative would be
solely focused on rapid implementation of the EEBC decision. Bolton
also describes in detail what he believes was the singular focus of former UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan, Annan’s deputy Mark Malloch Brown (now the UK’s
Minister for Africa and Asia) and many Security Council members on punishing
Eritrea for its restrictions on the UN peacekeeping force known as UNMEE and
the lack of focus on the main issue: Ethiopia’s obstruction of
demarcation. Bolton notes that UNMEE “was simply propping up Ethiopia’s flat violation of its commitments”
(page 344). Moreover, Bolton believes “Eritrea had a point: Ethiopia
had agreed on a mechanism to resolve the border dispute in 2000 and was now
welching on the deal” (Page 344). Bolton’s
revelation about Frazer, the lead U.S. official for African affairs, provides
a useful insight into the likely motivations of her recent hostile statements
towards Eritrea, coddling of the Ethiopian government and equivocal rhetoric
about demarcation. When
Frazer tells the Voice of America on November 6, 2007 that “demarcation
[between Ethiopia and Eritrea] should definitely be done, but it needs to be
done in the context of dialogue”, it is now clear what Frazer hopes to
accomplish through such “dialogue”. Frazer misleadingly states in the
same interview that Ethiopia has accepted the EEBC decision “without
condition”, while the truth, as noted in a September 28, 2007 letter by the
President of the EEBC to the UN Secretary General, is that “even if all of
Ethiopia’s conditions were met by Eritrea, Ethiopia would not commit itself
to anything more than discussion on demarcation.” It is not, therefore,
surprising that the State Department issued a press release on November 9,
2007 about a “boundary impasse” between Ethiopia and Eritrea that failed to
even mention the EEBC and instead focused on unspecified “efforts” by the
current UN Secretary General to “resolve” the situation. It is
with all of this background that one must also consider a November 6, 2007
Washington Post article in which an anonymous “U.S. government source”
speculated about future Ethiopian air strikes on the capital of Eritrea in
order to topple the Eritrean government and the U.S. Embassy in Addis Ababa’s
November 1, 2007 warning to American citizens in Ethiopia to stay at least
30-60 miles away from the border with Eritrea. |
|
The content below this line is advertisement generated automatically and ertra.com doesn't control or endorse the content in anyway.