|
Selling a conflict to the world Amanuel Biedemariam Before the start of the Iraq war, we all
witnessed the US war-machine in full gear in order to sell the war. It was a
multi faceted approach and an approach that certainly exposed the ideas of
the inner workings of the Bush administration and a snap shot on how the US
approaches work in general. The over-zealot nature, the hubris,
miscalculations and the lies that were exposed because of the mishandling of
the Iraq war helped a lot of people to come out and expose the US. It is a
public record and a subject of many books. It damaged the credibility of the
US for the foreseeable future. Selling conflicts and managing conflicts is an
integral part of any US administration regardless of who is in power ;
that is why you see the so called US experts get recycled over and over
again. In the beginning of the Eritrean and Ethiopian
conflict, there were pundits who played the games of selling the war
brilliantly. Initially they gave the appearance of neutrality but over time
their cover was blown and forced to take sides in this case they sided with
Ethiopia. We all recognize David Shinn as one of the main players in the Horn
who peddled and influenced opinion. Predictably and on queue, here comes David
Shinn giving interviews with the VOA as a neutral observer and expert of the
Horn trying to sell the newly concocted conflict between Eritrea and
Djibouti. For the curios, this is what he said; “I think it’s playing
into a competition that is going on between particularly Ethiopia and Eritrea
throughout the region. In addition, we certainly have seen that in Somalia it
self and I think it’s starting to play out to some extent in the case of
Djibouti. Djibouti has been an important ally of Ethiopia, particularly
economically, in terms of virtually all Ethiopian exports and imports passing
through the port of Djibouti. This of course is a huge moneymaker for
Djibouti, so it’s in their interest to continue this relationship. Eritrea
may see the concept of putting pressure on Djibouti as perhaps indirectly
creating some additional concern in Addis Ababa,” he says. For any one who likes to pay attention, these
are subliminal messages, particularly this one that insinuate a motive; “This
of course is a huge moneymaker for Djibouti, so it’s in their interest to
continue this relationship. Eritrea may see the concept of putting pressure
on Djibouti as perhaps indirectly creating some additional concern in Addis
Ababa.” According to David Shinn, Eritrea wants Ethiopia to
utilize its ports and Ethiopia will sure be forced to use Eritrean ports if
Djibouti is destabilized. This is under handed way of assigning guilt
and blame to Eritrea in order to label it aggressor as they have done in the
past with Ethiopia effectively! This statement is a compliment to the
statement the State Department gave to the international community, which
puts the blame directly on Eritrea with out any verification in contradiction
to the French observation that refutes the incursion! In the same breath, Mr. Shinn managed to put
this in a larger context by hinting this is another way that Ethiopia and
Eritrea are expanding their proxy wars in the wider Horn region and her is
the quote; “I think it’s playing into a competition that is going on
between particularly Ethiopia and Eritrea throughout the region. In addition,
we certainly have seen that in Somalia it self and I think it’s starting to
play out to some extent in the case of Djibouti.” The meeting that just ended in Djibouti is a
ploy by the US and a last ditch effort by the failed diplomat, Dr. Janday Frazer,
to give Ethiopia a way out and deflect attention from their failures in
Somalia. It is obvious in retrospect; one of the objectives of the meeting
was to pull Djibouti into the conflict. This statement by the Foreign Ministry of
Eritrea is a fitting perspective to the point; “Indeed, the sad and well-known fact is that US
policy and meddling in our region – starting from the border conflict between
Eritrea and Ethiopia to the situations in the Sudan, Kenya and Somalia – is
contributing to the proliferation and aggravation of crises. Consequently,
the resolution of problems has become elusive and the stability of our region
undermined.” A seasoned Horn expert like David Shinn should
know and understand by now, that Eritrea and the people of the Horn are not
to be fooled by his deception. Eritrea will never view Djibouti as a
competition that needs to be destabilized. Eritrea, since 2001 worked very
hard to establish and foster a neighborly relation with Djibouti based on cooperation
and not on competition. Furthermore, Eritrea makes it clear to the world,
repeatedly, that doesn’t intend to work with the minority clique in
Ethiopia. Shinn also said, regarding the United States
policy for the region; “You have to look at the region as a whole. You
can’t try to address any of these issues by looking separately at one
country. I mean obviously there are bilateral relationships and you have
bilateral dealings with each country. But if you treat your policy on
strictly a bilateral basis it’s almost guaranteed to fail.” Obviously, David Shinn must believe the
current instability in the Horn is the intended outcome ideal for the US,
confirming Eritrean believes. Otherwise, he would press the US hard to change
the failed policies that pins a one country against the other and help to
foster relations of cooperation. Unfortunately, history does not allow us to
have faith in the judgment of US. David Shinn must also understand Eritrea
was not handed to us in a silver platter! |
|
The
content below this line is advertisement generated automatically and ertra.com
doesn't control or endorse the content in anyway.